Wednesday, November 30, 2016

Foreign Minister Frank‑Walter Steinmeier and French Foreign Minister Jean‑Marc Ayrault to award the Franco‑German Prize for Human Rights

Foreign Minister Frank‑Walter Steinmeier and French Foreign Minister Jean‑Marc Ayrault to award the Franco‑German Prize for Human Rights

Foreign Ministers Steinmeier and Ayrault will award the first Franco‑German Prize for Human Rights and the Rule of Law on Thursday, 1 December. The prize pays tribute to 15 individuals from around the world for their civic courage and outstanding commitment to human rights. The White Helmets from Syria will receive a special prize. The award ceremony will be held in the context of international Human Rights Day on 10 December.

Before the ceremony, the two Foreign Ministers will meet for bilateral talks to discuss EU policy issues and international crises and conflicts.

Human rights



from
http://www.auswaertiges-amt.de/EN/Infoservice/Presse/Meldungen/2016/161129-D-F-Menschenrechtspreis.html?nn=479796

80% of Roma are at risk of poverty

The levels of deprivation, marginalisation, and discrimination of Europe’s largest minority is a grave failure of law and policy in the EU and its Member ...

from
http://www.west-info.eu/80-of-roma-are-at-risk-of-poverty/

The American in Italy explains who Trump really is

A tough and full-strength Trump is needed. It is all over if he lets himself be bridled by the old decision makers in his party. The ...

from
http://www.west-info.eu/the-american-in-italy-explains-who-trump-really-is/

The story of Mohammed Alsaleh, who assists Syrian refugee in Canada

“Welcome to Canada” is a short film that tells the story of Mohammed Alsaleh, who was born in Hasakeh, Syria, in what he describes as ...

from
http://www.west-info.eu/the-story-of-mohammed-alsaleh-who-assists-syrian-refugee-in-canada/

Statement by Foreign Minister Steinmeier on the crash of a Brazilian passenger plane

Statement by Foreign Minister Steinmeier on the crash of a Brazilian passenger plane

Foreign Minister Steinmeier issued the following statement in Minsk today (29 November) on the crash of a Brazilian passenger plane in Colombia:

Zusatzinformationen

This is terrible and particularly chilling news. Along with many other passengers and crew members, almost all of the players of the Brazilian first division football team Chapecoense were killed in the crash. They were en route to the first leg of the Copa Sudamericana, which they had long prepared for with hard work and perseverance.

We share the grief of the people in Brazil and all of Latin America for whom this news is a tremendous shock.

Our thoughts are with the victims of this tragic crash, as well as with their families and friends.


from
http://www.auswaertiges-amt.de/EN/Infoservice/Presse/Meldungen/2016/161128-BM_Flugzeugabsturz_Kolumbien.html?nn=479796

She wore a burkini during the semifinal of the Miss Minnesota USA

Halima Aden, a Somali-American teen, has made history after she wore a burkini and a hijab when participating in the semifinal of the Miss Minnesota ...

from
http://www.west-info.eu/she-wore-a-burkini-during-the-semifinal-of-the-miss-minnesota-usa/

Speech by Foreign Minister Frank‑Walter Steinmeier at the opening of the exhibition Between Two Stools ‑ The History of Italian Military Internees 1943‑45 at the Nazi Forced Labour Documentation Centre in Berlin

Speech by Foreign Minister Frank‑Walter Steinmeier at the opening of the exhibition Between Two Stools ‑ The History of Italian Military Internees 1943‑45 at the Nazi Forced Labour Documentation Centre in Berlin

“Cara mamma ritornerò”

“Dearest mother, I’ll come back,” these are the words that the Italian Andrea Talmon etched into his dish more than 70 years ago ‑ in barracks just like the one you see behind me.

His dish was a simple bowl from the Italian army ‑ dinged and scratched. But here in the camp, these bowls were more than just dishes. They were often the only thing the men had left from their beloved Italian homeland. Thus, they became a metal canvas for their yearnings and anguish. The prisoner Ivo Sghedoni left two compelling words on his bowl: “Fame e Paura” ‑ hunger and fear.


Professor Nachama,
Ms Glauning,
Mr Montagano,
honoured guests,
Paolo Gentiloni,

Hunger and fear. Suffering and injustice ‑ inflicted on Italian military internees by German National Socialists. It is to this that these men’s bowls bear witness. As does this disturbing and yet at the same time moving exhibition which we, Paolo, have the honour of opening today.

The National Socialists took hundreds of thousands of Italian men captive after Marshal Badoglio signed the armistice with the Allies in September 1943. Italy’s alliance with National Socialist Germany was over.

The Italian soldiers, who to that day had fought shoulder to shoulder with the German Wehrmacht, were now quite literally caught between two stools.

It was the Germans who had hitherto been their allies who herded them together, transported them in goods trains to the German Reich and Poland and forced them to perform hard and heavy work ‑ mainly in the armaments industry. And it was the same former allies who now openly and loudly ostracised them as traitors.

“Children threw stones at us and women spat at us,” as the Italian soldier Settimo Bosetti described it. “We were bad people, traitors, the scum of the earth. This contempt almost hurt more than the hunger!”

The dishes of men like Andrea Talmon tell us what this contempt for the lives of the internees really meant. For example, when the Nazis introduced a food‑for‑work system meaning food rations could be cut as an insidious punishment.

“I was forced to break up ice, let the frozen snow melt in the cooking pot on the ground and drink this water, such as it was,” the internee Esposito Donato recalled. “You picked the crumbs off the table. I do that to this day! ... Hunger is something you never shake off.”

More than 650,000 Italians were used as forced labourers in the German war economy. An almost unimaginable number. More than 50,000 died in captivity.

***

At a place like this here in Schöneweide, Paolo, we look back at the darkest chapter of our shared history. At unspeakable suffering and pain.

This look back into the dark past, to my mind, sheds light on our view of the present. At the long journey that our two countries have made over the past seven decades. A journey that built friendship and trust within a united Europe. For that I’m deeply grateful to you, Paolo, and to all our Italian friends.

This mutual trust also marked the start of our path towards a culture of shared remembrance – something we did not have for many years.

This work began during my first stint as foreign minister. I remember it well: Eight years ago my counterpart Franco Frattini and I stood in La Risiera de San Sabba, a former rice mill in Trieste, which the National Socialists made into a “death factory” ‑ a camp for prisoners of war, a camp in which to detain and torture hostages, partisans and other political prisoners. La Risiera de San Sabba became a transit camp for Jews prior to their deportation to concentration camps, for military internees prior to their deportation for forced labour.

There, at this dark place where between 3000 and 5000 people were murdered in the war, we resolved to set up a joint commission of historians. A commission to confront and examine the German‑Italian war past in a detailed and open manner.

The Commission recommended we create a Future Fund, a fund to provide concrete assistance to people working on exploring and coming to terms with the past and on reconciliation: whether through school competitions, exchange projects or documenting the abhorrent crimes perpetrated by National Socialists in Ponte Buggianese or in Civitella where German Wehrmacht soldiers carried out horrendous massacres.

Over the last two years, Paolo, I was able to visit these places. And what moved me above all when I was there, in places where the horror of our past is so palpable, was the way in which the people received us Germans. Not with rejection or animosity but with warm hearts and open minds. I was very touched by that.

Today we are opening another place for remembrance here in Schöneweide. This permanent exhibition, recommended by the German‑Italian Commission of Historians, creates a place where we shed light on the particular fate of the military internees drawing it out of the shadow of the past and into the present day.

Those who go down to the cellar of barrack 13 will be able to decipher inscriptions written on the walls by Italian prisoners.

And despite all the melancholy, it almost brings a smile to your face when you see the daily grind of hunger and suffering reflected in the etchings on the wall. One prisoner, for example, marked his place in the air‑raid shelter with the simple word “Riservato”. But there is another inscription. It is barely legible. Under the scribbled date 21 March 1945, a prisoner added a single word, perhaps to describe the end of an air raid: “Passato”. “It’s over”.

It’s over. The painful chapter of German‑Italian history which the Schöneweide camp represents is over and finished. But we must not and will not forget.

In fact, this place calls upon us to be vigilant. To ensure that hate and contempt never again make their way into our societies. To protect and nurture what we have achieved in Europe in the last 70 years: Peace. Partnership. Community.

Passato ‑ This is not a historical observation. It holds a message we should never forget.



from
http://www.auswaertiges-amt.de/EN/Infoservice/Presse/Reden/2016/161128-BM_Ausstellung_Zwischen_Allen_Stuehlen.html?nn=479796

Statement by the Federal Foreign Office on the situation in Aleppo

Statement by the Federal Foreign Office on the situation in Aleppo

A Federal Foreign Office Spokesperson issued the following statement today (28 November) on the situation in Aleppo:

Zusatzinformationen

As a result of the latest heavy fighting and the capture of large parts of eastern Aleppo by the regime and its supporters, the people in the area are in an absolutely desperate situation.

Thousands of people are risking life and limb trying to flee to neighbouring districts. Hundreds have been killed or severely injured in the past days, and people have no chance whatsoever of receiving the medical care they need to survive.

For the sake of the people in Aleppo, an immediate humanitarian ceasefire is needed. The fighting in the city must stop, aid supplies must be delivered to those in need and injured people must be evacuated.

This tragedy must come to an end. The regime and its supporters, particularly Russia and Iran, bear the greatest responsibility for this. Providing humanitarian access is the absolute minimum. This is a moral imperative and it is required by the humanitarian standards that unite the international community. No one may renege on this responsibility, especially at this time.


from
http://www.auswaertiges-amt.de/EN/Infoservice/Presse/Meldungen/2016/161128_BM_Aleppo.html?nn=479796

Speech by Minister of State for Europe Michael Roth at the opening of the dialogue on migration held in connection with the German-Czech Strategic Dialogue in Prague

Speech by Minister of State for Europe Michael Roth at the opening of the dialogue on migration held in connection with the German-Czech Strategic Dialogue in Prague

– Translation of advance text –

Ladies and gentlemen,

This is our third meeting for a dialogue on migration between Germany and the Czech Republic. I am very pleased that Vladimir Spidla and I launched this successful dialogue in early 2016, the aim of which is for our two countries to intensively and constructively share our experiences.

By working together through this dialogue in a spirit of trust, we can better tackle the challenges that all of Europe is facing in connection with refugees, migration and integration, as well as jointly search for European solutions.

Our ability to engage in dialogue is something that we must absolutely maintain. For we will only accomplish the great tasks that Europe must take on if we work together rather than against one another.

However, dialogue does not mean bringing to the discussion only like-minded participants. No, we need controversy, as well as different opinions and positions. All of this may be very trying, but it is also rewarding. We must never stop listening to the other side. We must take an honest interest in the experiences of our partners, and we must be open to advice. Also, it is vital that we not lose sight of what we have in common.

With regard to the refugee issue, Germany has demonstrated how a society can manage to take in 900,000 people who have fled their homes. We are happy that our Czech colleagues want to find out more about how we accomplished this.

Already at our last meeting, we discovered that we agree on a number of issues. The dialogue on migration is helping us arrive at common views.

The dialogue highlights similarities between our two countries with regard to migration policy, especially in terms of our integration efforts.

We learned this through the visit to projects in Berlin in June by the Czech delegation, and I am certain that we will identify many common approaches today, as well, during our meetings here in Prague. Integration policy must be judged in terms of solidarity, shared responsibility and humanity – on this point we agree.

Another issue on which we very much concur is the need to tackle the causes of refugee movements. That is urgently needed. Because as long as we fail to make progress on fighting the causes of refugee movements in the countries of origin, many of those fleeing their homes will continue to seek refuge in Europe.

In the delegations present here today we have experts who can tell us what Germany and the Czech Republic are doing now, and who can identify potential synergies. Our two countries intend to support a specific project in a country outside of the European Union, with a view to also strengthening our practical cooperation.

Our previous meetings in Prague and in Berlin have given us extensive opportunities to share experiences. Our focus was on the worries and fears of people that have arisen in connection with the very large migration movements. We must not amplify these fears, but rather must seek to reduce them through education and explanation. The dialogue on migration contributes to this, as well.

In Europe, our societies are values-based, pluralistic, multi-faith and multicultural. These common values are binding for all, and they offer protection for all, including refugees and migrants. We are open to different religions, ethnic groups and cultures. During encounters with people who have had to leave everything behind and who are looking for a brighter future, all sides must observe the fundamental principles of tolerance and respect for human dignity.

Through the dialogue on migration, we are able to draw closer to a common European understanding of integration. In Europe, we urgently need consensus on how we intend to achieve peaceful and respectful coexistence between people from very different ethnic, religious and cultural backgrounds.

Of course, the act of taking in a large number of refugees will not be without its conflicts. It is an enormous task, a task for all of us, by the way, for the native population and for the arriving refugees.

In essence, we must think about what expectations we have of the people who are seeking a new home in our midst. It is also about what we will need to do to make this happen.

On one issue, however, I believe we must not compromise in any way: Anyone who wants to stay here long term must respect our values and rules – with no ifs or buts. It’s not just criminal law that has to be respected.

Basic standards such as gender equality and tolerance of minorities also have to be accepted. For these values can’t be acquired in a vacuum. They have to be learned, to be seen in action – in kindergartens and at school, in youth groups and sports clubs.

And Integration is by no means a one-way street. There is the question of whether we ourselves do not also need to change, if we want to be a colourful, world-minded country of immigration. In the long run, we simply will not be able to say to those arriving here: “We’re the majority. You must adapt!”

No, we will have to accept that people who come here will in the medium term also help shape our society. We must view migration as an opportunity – not as a threat. Migration brings with it a diverse and colourful society. And I would go even further. This diversity and these many colours have always been, and remain, a strong European quality!

At this meeting, we intend to take initial results and recommendations that we gain through our dialogue on migration and include these in a joint declaration. Furthermore, we intend to recommend that the guiding principles set out in this declaration will become the foundation for cooperation between Germany and the Czech Republic in the areas of refugee, migration and integration policy.

I am pleased that with the declaration and our agreement to support a joint project we will have achieved two very concrete results through our dialogue.

The dialogue on migration between Germany and the Czech Republic is therefore a piece of encouraging good news with regard to Europe. And that is something we need lots more of!



from
http://www.auswaertiges-amt.de/EN/Infoservice/Presse/Reden/2016/161128-StM_R_D_CZE_Migrationsdialog.html?nn=479796

ITV Westcountry's report on the University of Bristol's new £300m campus



from
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cmg7g648gb0

Centre for Ethics in Medicine



from
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wk6c67ApaL4

Engaged African Literatures



from
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dgPWDwgLflM

Engaged Learning



from
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y5QbmzrItik

Policy paper: Immigration Rules archive: 19 May 2016 to 23 November 2016

This version of the Immigration Rules has been replaced by the current Immigration Rules.



from
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/immigration-rules-archive-19-may-2016-to-23-november-2016

Monday, November 28, 2016

Under Trump Jujustsu is better than psychoanalysis for Muslims

Since Trump won the American elections, Zaineb Abdulla, professional therapist, has invented a second job. In the evening, she teaches self-defence and Jujutsu to American Muslim ...

from
http://www.west-info.eu/under-trump-jujustsu-is-better-than-psychoanalysis-for-muslims/

‘Diamond-age’ of power generation as nuclear batteries developed

Since Trump won the American elections, Zaineb Abdulla, professional therapist, has invented a second job. In the evening, she teaches self-defence and Jujutsu to American Muslim women. A personal response to the alarm launched by a report by the influential Pewaaa

from
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b6ME88nMnYE

Eureka Moments: Professor Nick Davies



from
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uvBTDjBvbo4

Statement by the Federal Foreign Office on the train crash in Iran

Statement by the Federal Foreign Office on the train crash in Iran

A Federal Foreign Office spokesperson issued the following statement today (25 November) following the train crash in Iran:

Zusatzinformationen

“The train crash in the Iranian province of Semnan has claimed the lives of many people and injured many others. The rescue operation is proving difficult. Our thoughts are with the victims of the accident and their families. We wish all those who have been injured a rapid recovery and offer our condolences to the Iranian people.”


from
http://www.auswaertiges-amt.de/EN/Infoservice/Presse/Meldungen/2016/161125_Zugunglueck_Iran.html?nn=479796

Statement by the Federal Foreign Office on the wildfires in Israel

Statement by the Federal Foreign Office on the wildfires in Israel

A Federal Foreign Office spokesperson issued the following statement today (25 November) on the wildfires in Israel:

Zusatzinformationen

It is with utmost concern that we are following the many wildfires that have been raging in Israel for several days. In a spirit of heartfelt solidarity we stand firmly by Israel’s side.

Our thoughts are with the injured and the tens of thousands who have had to evacuate their homes, not knowing when they will be able to return. It does now appear that the first inhabitants of Haifa may be allowed to return to their apartments and houses.

We most certainly hope this will be the case, and we wish all rescue workers the continued great strength they will require during these difficult days to successfully fight the fires and bring people to safety.

We are ready to assist wherever help is needed and desired. The great willingness on the part of many international partners to help Israel is sending an important message.


from
http://www.auswaertiges-amt.de/EN/Infoservice/Presse/Meldungen/2016/161125_Israel_Feuer.html?nn=479796

Speech by Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier at the Hamburg Summit: China meets Europe

Speech by Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier at the Hamburg Summit: China meets Europe

President Fritz Melsheimer,
Vice-Premier Liu Yandong,
Vice-President Jyrki Katainen,
Mayor Olaf Scholz,
Ladies and gentlemen!

When a man and woman have been married for thirty years, we call it their pearl wedding anniversary in Germany, and it’s an occasion well worth celebrating – at least for couples who have enjoyed their long years together.

In May 1986, Shanghai and Hamburg got twinned. And this couple have not just tolerated each other’s company for thirty years; they have built a close partnership whose like I have rarely seen among the town twinnings I know – and that across an impressive distance of 13,000 kilometres. Twinning these two cities not only established their own partnership but also helped bring about the Hamburg Summit, which connects Hamburg, Germany and indeed Europe to China.

I’d like to thank you for the invitation, Mr Schües. I am delighted to have been made part of this event for a third time. That may not quite amount to a pearl anniversary, but still!

Vice-Premier Liu,

I happen to know that your home town is Nantong, only a hundred kilometres from Shanghai. That’s just a stone’s throw away by Chinese standards, so we could say that Hamburg is actually your twin town too. Let me therefore sincerely bid you welcome, once again, to Germany and particularly to Hamburg.

Olaf,

I want to thank you for the opportunity to be back in Hamburg. I don’t know how many times I’ve visited already this year; people in Berlin are starting to ask why. And I’ll be back in Hamburg again the week after next, because my fellow foreign ministers from 56 other countries will join me here for the end of Germany’s OSCE Chairmanship.

Ladies and gentlemen,

Just like a good marriage, a partnership between cities, countries and regions needs more than initial mutual fascination if it is to last. Other factors – sensible, pragmatic considerations – have to be involved. Both parties need to have the feeling that they can achieve more together than they could on their own. I think I can say that this has long been more than just a feeling between Shanghai and Hamburg. That pairing proves its worth year after year.

We can see how close the relationship is very tangibly here in Hamburg. Almost one in three containers unloaded in Hamburg come from China, while one in five Airbus planes assembled in Finkenwerder go to buyers in China.

Those close ties between our countries and our place on the world stage mean that we have a responsibility not only to one another as partners but also to the international order – particularly in these turbulent and stormy times!

Looking back on 2016, it has certainly been full of surprises. Since we’re in a harbour city – the waters have been troubled and boats have been rocked. I am of course thinking of the British deciding they no longer wanted to be part of the European Union and, naturally, of the outcome of the US presidential election, which took me too by surprise. The list could go on and on.

I need hardly explain to you, ladies and gentlemen, how much political developments in the world are shaped by economic realities and how much those developments, in turn, directly affect the economy.

Once we accept that there will always be a considerable amount of uncertainty in international politics and in the global economy, a certain risk of internal and external shocks, we have to ask ourselves how we intend to deal with that. One answer, which I find persuasive, is that, under conditions of uncertainty and upheaval, we must try to create the highest possible level of reliability. Reliability is hard currency, both in politics and in business.

Ladies and gentlemen,

I am convinced that rules-based interaction, a rules-based order, is absolutely key to successfully dealing with the uncertainties we face and creating reliability. On the basis of our shared values. The values to which we have committed ourselves at the international level – at the United Nations, for example – whether they be in the sphere of peace and security or in the realm of human rights. The world expects international players like Germany and China to conduct themselves in compliance with international law and the rules of peaceful international interaction. Those rules can only be set jointly; no one player can change them unilaterally.

We therefore have to work together on strengthening international law and the international order. We should be particularly conscious of that here in Hamburg, a city that not only looks back on centuries of international seafaring but also, as the home of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea, stands for the settlement of conflicts by law.

Strengthening the international order is one of Germany’s core foreign-policy goals, and I have no doubt that it is in China’s interests too. China’s objective interests, not least as a major trading nation, often chime with our own, e.g. when it comes to putting an end to conflicts and crises. Just think of our extremely intensive cooperation on the Iran dossier: China and Germany were both part of the E3+3 group, fighting and negotiating side by side for more than twelve years to find a compromise that would prevent the spread of nuclear weapons in the Middle East. Germany and China are on the same page in terms of other global goods too; I’m thinking specifically of the Paris Climate Agreement. And we will be taking up the baton of the G20 Presidency from China in the coming year. We want to strengthen the international order alongside China, and we will be building on the work done this year under China’s Presidency to that end.

Ladies and gentlemen,

Reliability is a key pillar of Germany and China’s bilateral relations too. I may have said earlier that 2016 had been full of surprises, but that certainly wasn’t the case for relations between our two countries. The past twelve months have seen more frequent high-level visits between Germany and China than any other year since diplomatic relations began 44 years ago. China has hosted the Federal Chancellor, the Economic Affairs Minister and Deputy Chancellor, the intergovernmental consultations and myself. I am pleased, Vice-Premier Liu, to be extending that impressive list with your visit today.

Reliability, ladies and gentlemen, is also a valued asset in our economic relations. We are a reliable partner to China. And Germany is an open market economy. I will happily reiterate what Gerhard Schröder said yesterday: Chinese investment is very welcome here. However, as discussed with the President and Premier at the intergovernmental consultations, it also has to be clear that this cannot be a one-way street. Our openness depends on our companies also finding equal treatment and fair market access in China. On both sides, we need to be able to rely on legal certainty and the protection of intellectual property and trade secrets. That may have been a one-sided German concern in the past, but given the breathtaking economic and technological development in China, I think it is now in the interests of both our governments and all our companies for these subjects to be discussed and resolved in open and fair dialogue.

In these turbulent times, we should do all we can to ensure that our two countries can remain driving forces in the global economy. That will require close German-Chinese cooperation. There are plenty of areas that we can work on together. Industry 4.0, for example, is a topic vital to the future of both our economies – as evidenced by the Made in China 2025 strategy, which outlines some pretty ambitious goals.

Ladies and gentlemen,

It is our shared hope that we can successfully extend our dialogue and our openness to one another beyond the realms of politics and business. Along with the exchange of goods and services, we should facilitate the exchange of ideas, stories and experiences – in other words, exchange between people.

Vice-Premier Liu,

We want to continue to develop our dialogue with China and nurture exchange within civil society – be that in education, research or sport (thinking particularly of football, though that may be a difficult subject here in Hamburg, given the two Hamburg teams’ current league positions), or be it in the promotion of tourism, where I still see a lot of potential. But let me make one thing very clear on that point: Chinese tourists are more than welcome in Germany!

Today, Vice-Premier Liu, we will officially bring the German-Chinese youth exchange year to an end together. It has been, as I see it, an almost unexpectedly successful year.

The programme has given more that 4000 young people from Germany and China the opportunity to get to know each other’s countries, languages and cultures, to see the world from new and different perspectives and quite simply to make new friends.

With a bit of luck, it may even have sown the seeds for one or two pearl anniversaries of the future... but that’s not really a politician’s remit.

Thank you very much.



from
http://www.auswaertiges-amt.de/EN/Infoservice/Presse/Reden/2016/161124-Hamburg_Summit_China_Meets_Europe.html?nn=479796

Address by Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier at the closing event for the German-Chinese Year of School and Youth Exchange, University of Hamburg

Address by Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier at the closing event for the German-Chinese Year of School and Youth Exchange, University of Hamburg

Vice-Premier Liu,
Prof. Lenzen,
Distinguished Year of School and Youth Exchange participants,

Neither political nor economic exchanges would be complete without cultural exchanges and the real-life encounters between school pupils and young people that we are celebrating today.

I am delighted to be with you today at the University of Hamburg for this opportunity to take stock, together with you, of the German-Chinese Year of School and Youth Exchange, as well as hear your impressions from the past twelve months, some of which we saw in a brief film just a moment ago.

Among all of these experiences, you surely heard one question from friends and relatives in particular:

Why China of all places? Or, the other way around, why Germany?

Seventeen-year-old Joel was asked this question time and again after he chose to attend school in China for a year. From Ravensburg to Hangzhou with its almost nine million inhabitants! Incredulous amazement, a total lack of comprehension and also admiration for making such a brave decision to go there ensued. Joel, for his part, didn’t allow himself to be deterred. A few months later, he got to experience China for himself – and received a warm welcome from a Chinese host family! Along with 50 fellow students, he studied from morning till night, five days a week, and was surprised to learn that the word “swot” is actually meant as a compliment in China ‑ if I think back to my student days, then I must say that I don’t recall hearing anything like that!

Life in China also meant – and that I have also experienced myself – forgetting all the traffic laws learned in Germany, getting hopelessly lost and then – with the support of helpful Chinese people, communicating with hands and feet, getting to your destination in the end.

While Joel spent a year in China, 17‑year‑old Haonan went to school in Germany, and has since returned to her home country. In the course of five months, she visited 14 cities and discovered that the German word for travel, “reisen”, has different connotations compared with the Chinese term. Whereas Germans sometimes take it to mean wandering around museums for several hours, the Chinese word rather implies “visiting sights and taking lots of photos”.

Distinguished participants of the German-Chinese Year of School and Youth Exchange,

While it might be the case that your impressions and experiences were very different from those of Haonan and Joel, I imagine that you felt something quite similar while staying in another country. You discovered the world through different eyes; you had a change of perspective. Relationships can emerge from your encounters, from the encounters between these young people, that turn into relationships – relationships that evolve into friendships. Friendships based on awareness, understanding and respect.

This is precisely the point at which our cultural relations and education policy comes into play. “Exchange, Friendship, Future”. These are the watchwords of the German-Chinese Year of School and Youth Exchange.

With this in mind, I wish to thank all of our partners who made this exchange and dialogue possible with over one hundred events and programmes. I would also like to express my gratitude to representatives from the Federation and the Länder, as well as to private foundations and members of civil society.

My particular thanks goes to our Chinese partners and, above all, to you, Ms Liu, whose idea this joint Year of School and Youth Exchange was in the first place. My biggest thanks, however, goes to you, the over 4000 participants. You had the courage, for a limited period of time at any rate, to depart from the realm of the familiar and to delve into uncharted territory! We need both curiosity and respect in German-Chinese relations.

Thank you very much.



from
http://www.auswaertiges-amt.de/EN/Infoservice/Presse/Reden/2016/161124-D-CHN_Schueler-und-Jugendaustauschjahr.html?nn=479796

It’s easier to work in Italy for migrant seasonal workers

Simpler rules, in Italy, for the employers who want to hire foreign seasonal workers. It enters into force today, in fact, the legislative decree transposing ...

from
http://www.west-info.eu/its-easier-to-work-in-italy-for-migrant-seasonal-workers/

Saturday, November 26, 2016

A rare success story for second-generation immigrants

The children of non-EU immigrants resident in Denmark study as much as their native contemporaries. Amongst the second generations of those aged 20-29 years, 39% ...

from
http://www.west-info.eu/a-rare-success-story-for-second-generation-immigrants/

Guidance: Free movement rights: family members of British citizens

UK Visas and Immigration guidance on how staff consider applications for a residence card made by a family member of a British citizen in line with the Immigration (European Economic Area) Regulations 2006.



from
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/free-movement-rights-family-members-of-british-citizens

Guidance: EEA family permits: guidance for entry clearance officers

UK Visas and Immigration guidance for entry clearance officers (ECOs) on how to assess and decide applications for EEA family permits made under the Immigration (European Economic Area) Regulations 2006.



from
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/eea-family-permits-guidance-for-entry-clearance-officers

Eureka Moments: Professor Helen Skaer

Guidance on how to assess and decide applications for EEA family permits.

from
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F-xWSCdHLS0

Ministerial declaration by the foreign ministers of the like-minded group supporting a relaunch of conventional arms control in Europe

Ministerial declaration by the foreign ministers of the like-minded group supporting a relaunch of conventional arms control in Europe

Zusatzinformationen

We, the Foreign Ministers of the Republic of Austria, the Kingdom of Belgium, the Republic of Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, the Republic of Finland, the French Republic, the Federal Republic of Germany, the Italian Republic, the Kingdom of the Netherlands, the Kingdom of Norway, the Slovak Republic, the Kingdom of Spain, the Kingdom of Sweden and the Swiss Confederation, are deeply concerned about the continuing erosion of the rules-based European security order. In our part of the world, peace and stability, including the peaceful settlement of conflicts, have been guaranteed for decades by a reliable, rules-based order firmly grounded in well-established and non-negotiable principles of international law such as territorial integrity, sovereignty, inviolability of international borders, the right to neutrality and the free choice of alliances and one’s own security policy, as enshrined in the Helsinki Final Act and the Charter of Paris.

Reiterating that security in Europe is indivisible, we reaffirm our commitment to these principles and express our concern that some of these principles are being violated. A number of worrying developments and actions over the last years, including the illegal annexation of Crimea by the Russian Federation and the following and ongoing crisis in Eastern Ukraine, have raised serious doubts about the prospects of cooperative security on our continent.

In addition, the existing regimes of arms control are crumbling. The CFE Treaty, which led to the destruction of tens of thousands of heavy weapon systems in Europe in the years following 1990, is no longer being implemented by the Russian Federation. The Vienna Document is in need of substantial modernization and some provisions of the Open Skies Treaty are not being fully implemented. These regimes are mutually reinforcing and need to be strengthened.

Confronted with the increasingly unstable security situation in Europe, we see an urgent need to re-establish strategic stability, restraint, predictability and verifiable transparency and to reduce military risks.

We are convinced that a relaunch of conventional arms control is one important path towards a genuine and effective cooperative security allowing for peace and stability on our continent.

We are preparing for an in-depth and inclusive debate on the future of conventional arms control in Europe through an exploratory, structured dialogue. A central forum for such a dialogue is the OSCE*.

We call upon all states that share responsibility for Europe’s security to join our endeavor and to support a structured dialogue on conventional arms control in Europe. Working together, we can actively contribute to strengthening security for all on our continent.

*Organization for Security and Co‑operation in Europe



from
http://www.auswaertiges-amt.de/EN/Infoservice/Presse/Meldungen/2016/161125-Erkl_Freundesgruppe_Konv_Ruestungskontrolle_Europa.html?nn=479796

Foreign Minister Steinmeier and Italian Foreign Minister Gentiloni to open exhibition “Between Two Stools” on Italian military internees in the Second World War

Foreign Minister Steinmeier and Italian Foreign Minister Gentiloni to open exhibition “Between Two Stools” on Italian military internees in the Second World War

On Monday, 28 November 2016, Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier and his Italian counterpart Paolo Gentiloni will open the exhibition, Between Two Stools – The History of Italian Military Internees 1943-1945. The exhibition, for which the Foreign Office is providing funding of 1.45 million euros via the German-Italian Future Fund, sends an important message as regards coming to terms with the German-Italian war past.

Foreign Minister Steinmeier and Foreign Minister Gentiloni commented as follows: 

Zusatzinformationen

We need to look at the past in order to grasp how far Germans and Italians have come in the past seven decades and to understand the path that has led to the close friendship that unites our countries today. This would not have been possible without forgiveness, mutual trust and shared remembrance.

Furthermore, these achievements brought about the united and peaceful Europe where we live together today. The exhibition is a stark reminder that there is no alternative to dialogue and reconciliation.


In 2008, the German and Italian Foreign Ministers agreed that there should be close cooperation on this topic and tasked the German-Italian Commission of Historians with its research. 

The exhibition has come about at the recommendation of the Commission of Historians and will be shown at the Nazi Forced Labour Documentation Centre in Berlin. For further information, please click here:

external link, opens in new windowhttp://www.dz-ns-zwangsarbeit.de/en/



from
http://www.auswaertiges-amt.de/EN/Infoservice/Presse/Meldungen/2016/161125-D_ITA_Ausstellung_Zwischen_allen_Stuehlen.html?nn=479796

Federal Foreign Office on the attack on Shia pilgrims in Iraq

Federal Foreign Office on the attack on Shia pilgrims in Iraq

A Federal Foreign Office Spokesperson issued the following statement today (24 November) concerning the attack on Shia pilgrims in Iraqi city of Al-Hilla:

Zusatzinformationen

The brutal bomb attack at a petrol station in the city of Al-Hilla south-east of Baghdad, at which buses carrying Shia pilgrims had stopped on the way back from Kerbela, left many dead or injured, including many Iranians. This highlights once more the sheer contempt IS has for human life and the terrorists’ endless hate of centuries-old religious traditions.

We condemn this abhorrent crime in the strongest possible terms. Our thoughts are with the victims of this attack and their families, and we wish those injured a speedy recovery.

We hope people in Iraq will find the strength to stand together united and strong at this difficult time and – together with their Iranian neighbours – to vigorously resist any attempts by ruthless murderers to turn different religious or ethnic communities against each other. They must not be allowed to succeed.


from
http://www.auswaertiges-amt.de/EN/Infoservice/Presse/Meldungen/2016/161124_AA_Anschlag_Pilger_Bagdad.html?nn=479796

Foreign Minister Steinmeier on the signing of the Colombian peace agreement

Foreign Minister Steinmeier on the signing of the Colombian peace agreement

Foreign Minister Steinmeier today (24 November) issued the following statement on the signing of the new peace agreement between the Colombian Government and FARC guerillas: 

Zusatzinformationen

Today another crucial step has been taken towards ending the armed conflict in Colombia. The Government, but also the FARC, have again proven how serious they are about peace and have demonstrated that they will not give up looking for ways to achieve it. But it is still far too early to feel relief. The peace process is now at a critical juncture: the ceasefire is extremely fragile, and the increase in politically motivated killings shows that other violent players are doing their utmost to torpedo Colombia’s path to a peaceful future.

It will be like a race against time to put this written commitment to peace into practice as soon as possible. With peace within reach, therefore, it is now more important than ever to realise that now is not the time for political differences or tactical strategies with an eye to elections. All parties represented in Congress should be determined to work constructively to shape peace in their country. The people’s hopes for a life unmarked by violence, particularly in those areas in which this conflict has already left serious scars, must not be disappointed any more.


from
http://www.auswaertiges-amt.de/EN/Infoservice/Presse/Meldungen/2016/161124_AM_Friedensabkommen_Kolumbien.html?nn=479796

Speech by Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier at the budget debate in the German Bundestag

Speech by Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier at the budget debate in the German Bundestag

Madam President,
Fellow members of this House,

We are living in times of turmoil, times of change. Some people go so far as to say that these are earthquakes whose shock waves have not yet entirely reached us here in Germany – the Brexit decision, violence in eastern Ukraine, the war raging in Syria and instability in Turkey, from where I returned last week feeling if anything even more concerned that I did when I arrived. And naturally, Donald Trump’s election as new US President will bring changes whose direction and consequences we cannot yet predict here at the moment.

Changes and upheavals can cause anxiety and paralysis. But that, esteemed colleagues, would be precisely the wrong answer. We cannot allow ourselves to react like a rabbit caught in the headlights – there is no doubt in my mind about that. We must not allow ourselves to be shaken by earthquakes. Instead, we need to stand firm and to be all the more resolute now in our support of democracy, freedom and an open society, to defend these things now in particular, when others are calling them into question.

With a view to the upheavals, we must become aware of our own international responsibility and, if possible, act accordingly. Reliable and responsible German foreign policy is now all the more important. Such foreign policy naturally requires clear analysis, direction and orientation, but it also needs – and this is why we are here today – a financial basis.

When I look back on the past three years and see how we have had to take on new and greater responsibility in many foreign policy areas during this time, it becomes apparent that it was the German Bundestag that gave us this scope in the first place so that we could play our part, take on this growing responsibility and live up to it. I would like to thank all of you here in the German Bundestag for this support.

I am afraid that things will not calm down in the near future. And that is why it is clear that as long as the violence, killing and dying do not stop – be it in Syria, Libya, Iraq or Yemen – our endeavours to bring about political solutions must not stop either, particularly not now in these uncertain times.

No matter how desperate the situation is in Syria, Libya and Yemen, we must not succumb to a feeling of powerlessness. Yes, far too many attempts may have failed in the past and many people say there is simply no point in trying, but I believe that our position must be – and above all, must remain – that giving up is not an option.

This also goes for eastern Ukraine. Just a few weeks ago, a Normandy format summit was held here in Berlin, that is, between Ukraine, France, Russia and Germany. The situation improved significantly for a few days, perhaps for a fortnight, but in the meantime the security situation has deteriorated once again in the region. The ceasefire is being breached again more frequently, and those who pay the price are local people, for whom the violence and uncertainty have been a harsh reality of everyday life for far too long.

Standing firm does not mean waiting and not doing anything and is not how one takes on responsibility. That is why my French counterpart Jean-Marc Ayrault and I suggested to our Russian and Ukrainian colleagues that we meet again in Minsk next week. “How many times have you met now?” some might ask. I have stopped counting. But even if we do not achieve a great breakthrough soon, such meetings and talks are simply necessary in order to ensure that the situation does not spiral out of control.

Even when it is difficult and progress is slow – excruciatingly slow – we must not abandon our efforts to implement the Minsk Agreement step by step. The disengagement of forces that we have started must be continued. The heavy weapons that were withdrawn, but were then moved back again, must be withdrawn for good. Above all, we urgently need progress on humanitarian and economic issues.

I hope that we will discuss all this next Tuesday. I hope that our Russian and Ukrainian colleagues will see the urgency of the situation the same way as we do. Both sides are called upon to finally take tangible steps to bring about lasting détente in Ukraine.

***

Esteemed colleagues,

Those who try to make use of the upheavals and uncertainties of these weeks to gain ground are acting irresponsibly and making the situation even worse. I say this primarily with regard to the situation in Syria, where the killing is continuing every day. In eastern Aleppo, the last operational hospital, which, by the way, was run with help from Germany, has been completely destroyed by bombing. For the people in eastern Aleppo, this means they no longer have any access whatsoever to medical care. And at the same time, more people are being injured every day.

The regime in Damascus is cynically taking action against its own people, with military support from Iran and Russia, allegedly to fight IS and al-Nusra. But in our view, there is no fight against IS – at least not on the part of the regime. Moreover, the fight against terrorist groups, as necessary as it is, can never be an excuse to lay waste to the entire city of Aleppo.

With each further victim, each school that is hit and each hospital that is destroyed, the logic of violence is intensified, without our coming the slightest bit closer to ending the madness. And perhaps it is the other way round – far too many people are now gambling on the power vacuum following the US election and on military advances. Unfortunately, the mistaken belief that one will need to be able to prove the smallest of military advantage in the next round of negotiations with a new US President is far too widespread. If this is the logic of those involved, then the time until next February, until a new US administration has been installed in the White House, will be absolutely terrible for the people in Syria. We must break this logic. We cannot allow the talks about ceasefires and humanitarian aid to stop now during this transitional period in Washington. UN Special Envoy Staffan de Mistura was here in  Berlin yesterday. He argued passionately for a continuation of these talks. I assured him of the German Government’s support. But I am certain that he also has the support of this entire House.

It is good that we are talking about ceasefires and humanitarian aid. But that will not be enough in the end. What is important is that we already start thinking now about how we can give the people in the region hope for the future after the fighting has ended. I say this at the moment less with a view to Syria, but with a view to Iraq, where this is topical. I received my Iraqi counterpart and his delegation in Berlin last week. We discussed the military situation in Mosul, the last IS stronghold, in depth. Of course, the first priority is to combat IS as quickly and with as few civilian victims as possible. However, we mainly discussed how things should continue in Mosul once the city has been liberated from IS, hopefully in a few weeks’ time.

Our experiences in Ramadi and Fallujah, but in particular in Tikrit, where we were able to provide essential goods to people very shortly after the liberation, showed how important these stabilisation efforts are and why we are focusing on them so much. Water and electricity lines were switched back on or restored, and a minimum level of health care was provided, all at a low cost. Progress was tangible. Ninety percent of the civilian population has returned to Tikrit. We are guided by this experience.

This is why stabilisation is now a key element of our foreign policy work. And this is also thanks to the support of the German Bundestag and the increased funding in the last two budgets. Thank you very much indeed for this!

***

A few moments ago, I said that we are living in a time of change. With regard to the US, we cannot yet say exactly what political impact the changes will have. There is one thing we can say with certainty: the dialogue, political channels of communication and interpersonal connections across the Atlantic must continue to play a crucial role in the future, too. And I am certain that they will continue to do so. At the moment, we are urging Washington to value and uphold transatlantic relations as the foundation of the West. Nevertheless, we will have to wait and see what position the new administration adopts.

I am therefore all the more pleased that we have been able to create new interpersonal and cultural connections across the Atlantic now in particular. With the support of the German Bundestag, it was ultimately possible to acquire Thomas Mann’s former home in California and to save it from demolition. I am very grateful indeed for the provision of funding, but above all for the rapid decision on this topic.

Thomas Mann’s home in LA was something like the White House of exile during the Nazi regime. It was home for many Germans, who worked together towards a better future for our country. When artists and intellectuals met in Thomas Mann’s villa, they had intense discussions on Germany, America, the paths to an open society and – something one can perhaps not over-emphasise today – what binds us together, that is, the transatlantic foundation of shared values.

I firmly believe that in a conflict-ridden world we need precisely this sort of room for dialogue – in particular with the US. And with room like this, I do not mean an echo chamber, in which we simply confirm each other’s views. I mean room that creates space for an honest discussion, for exchange and debate. It is important to create room where we do not ignore differences, but rather make them the subject of our discussion, which should be conducted directly with one another and ideally without distortion or exaggeration by the media. This is the aim of our cultural relations and education policy. In conclusion, I would also like to thank you for supporting this third and increasingly important pillar of foreign policy. 



from
http://www.auswaertiges-amt.de/EN/Infoservice/Presse/Reden/2016/161123_BM_Haushalt.html?nn=479796

Friday, November 25, 2016

Colin Pillinger Memorial Talk - Beagle 2 and Bedbugs



from
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lT4DQxZnxYY

The videogame that cuts down ISIS recruits

Toujorus le Choix is the on-line role-play game promoted by the French government to dissuade young people from the Islamic call. Emma and Medhi are ...

from
http://www.west-info.eu/the-videogame-that-cuts-down-isis-recruits/

Statement by the Federal Foreign Office on settlement plans in East Jerusalem

Statement by the Federal Foreign Office on settlement plans in East Jerusalem

A Federal Foreign Office Spokesperson issued the following statement today (24 November) on a decision by the municipal authorities of Jerusalem to relaunch the planning process for the expansion of Ramat Shlomo settlement in East Jerusalem:

Zusatzinformationen

The municipal authorities of Jerusalem have announced a continuation of the planning process for 500 housing units in Ramat Shlomo settlement in East Jerusalem. The construction of these units would also extend on to privately owned Palestinian land.

The Federal Government has repeatedly made its standpoint clear: settlement activities in the occupied territories, and thus also in East Jerusalem, violate international law. Settlements pose a further obstacle to the possibility of a peace process.

We are following these developments, which play a role in increasing tension between the two population groups and undermine peace on the basis of a two-state solution in the long term, with great concern.

Background information:

The plan includes the expansion of Ramat Shlomo settlement by 500 housing units on privately owned Israeli land, as well as the construction of access roads and public parks that would require the expropriation of Palestinian landowners.

During the original planning process in 2014, alternative suggestions that would have upheld Palestinian ownership rights were rejected. However, the plans were suspended in the wake of international pressure.

On 20 November 2016, a spokesperson of the municipal authorities announced that the plans to build the 500 housing units at Ramat Shlomo settlement were being relaunched. On 22 November 2016, the local Planning and Construction Committee decided to forward the building project plan to the municipal Planning Committee so that the latter can publish it for comments.



from
http://www.auswaertiges-amt.de/EN/Infoservice/Presse/Meldungen/2016/161124_Siedlungen.html?nn=479796

My Experience Doing a Master’s Degree in Germany

HAW Hamburg

I started learning the German language before actually getting to Germany. I attended intensive courses in my home country as a means of preparation for my move. However, coming here without first learning to speak the language, will still get you pretty far and fine. You will soon have to become fluent in German, either way!  Start looking for your German classes at the Goethe-Institut in your home country, if you are thinking about moving.

Having graduated at the AAB College as a straight A student from Kosovo, studying media technology in HAW Hamburg was the next best step that I took. I chose Germany for its distinguished high degree of high-tech community and options. And this is apparent in all of Germany, not just a few major cities!

The reason I would recommend studying in Germany is the spark this country manages to give to your deep sense of creativity. Studies are time-dependent – you get to choose what works for you in Germany, pretty much everywhere!

  1. No tuition fees at public universities in Germany – literally free of charge for all students, domestic and international alike. The German higher education system consists of 400 institutions divided into public and private institutions. Public institutions are tuition free and they host over 2.4 million students, while the private institutions host a smaller number, less than 5% of the total student body. Prices of studying and living in Germany are very suitable for international students, while the most attractive reason remains the price of study! To get settled here, you have to go through Student Service Offices and get a flat in the student’s hall, which is way cheaper. My leisure time I spend outside with my fellow students – what’s more, transport facilities are very good and cheap, making the living conditions very affordable for international students too. The idea is that every student coming to study here gets a warm welcome feeling and a deep dive into their passion and possibilities!
  1. German universities hold a tradition of qualitative education, excelling infrastructure as well as curriculum. Packed dense with contemporary technology and a diversified professional staff that contribute to an enlightening curriculum provide a solid base for future generations of experts in whichever discipline of choice. German university degrees are recognized internationally, giving you a good start to an international career, without a doubt! And you can always give back to your home country, from the experience and knowledge gained through working in research or for a company there. Research problems are very industrial and of our time that you must continue to grow and learn each day in order to continue with your progress in the specific field you have been given the great opportunity to continue your work and studies.Even if you decide to return to your home country, you will still come back as a different person, with a lot of great experience and knowledge collected throughout your years abroad to help your country towards flourishing and prosperity!There are study programs available entirely in English if your German is not quite there, yet! You may want to go easy on yourself and take up the English program while your German skills gradually advance, in which case you can always switch to German. Another cherished aspect of studying here, is the open interactions and introductions to other students coming here from other countries. Getting close to your fellow students will provide more support for your study journey. Take this responsibility to enjoy this special time!
  1. Looking for a job to support yourself is the best idea for new international students in Germany! There is a limitation for international students, that are required a German visa, to also apply for a work permit if planning to work over the allowed student hours: 190 full days or 240 half days per year. Whereas, practice-oriented German universities have agreements with great companies to offer internships for students, which can lead to a great future job after graduation.Many campaigns are organized to raise awareness and interest to other foreign students about the conditions of studying in Germany – the world leading country in the cultivation of modern technology! “Study in Germany” campaigns are supported to raise awareness among students to benefit from the possibility of coming to study at the educational and research institutes that are abundant in German cities. Furthermore, Germany is positioned in the top list of the best industrial and technological countries in the world!
  1. Explore all aspects of the German way of life! German people are friendly, but they also respect and value your privacy! Germans are curious and they are friends for life, once open! Outdoor activities are popular, such as cycling, hiking, skiing, and more. Most German cities are artsy and have a vivid underground music scene, fashion, books and ideals, which will further expand your horizons and understanding! Getting to join the local group of friends, you will soon learn about the real life in Germany. There are many green spaces and parks in every neighborhood – the ideal spaces to calm your mind and get it together, especially before exams!Surreal landscapes, great architecture and loads of historical data to be revealed! Its efficient and safe public transportation is another perk of studying in Germany. You get a travel card for free by paying for your enrollment and administrative taxes in the university. You can also take the advantage and explore different cities at the same time. In this way you get to experience the whole region and its various dialects and you will absolutely have a wide-spoken language under your belt!
  1. You can seek work after graduation easily as the law allows international graduates to stay in Germany for an additional 18 months, specifically for finding work. If you are lucky as many of us, you will stay in Germany for longer and do the job of your dreams! You will certainly learn how to apply the knowledge gained in real practical matters. Plus, a lot of the companies collaborate with the universities, giving great opportunities to find work for most students. A lot of the problems you encounter during studies/class get resolved during a day at work! This is a great chance for students to also apply their knowledge and transcend.

As a very clean and beautiful environment, I like to spend my time developing further on my career here in Germany, as the technology is growing rather rapidly.

As a foreigner, you can also  become a  good international link for the German education methods and advantages. Therefore, ze Germans like to keep their doors of communication with friends open, warmly welcoming all students that are eager to gain substantial  knowledge through the German study material!

In the future, I hope to work as a sound designer or a recording engineer  and that’s what I’m learning a lot about – sounds and sound recordings here at the HAW.  And the courses are very practical. You get a direct experience during the projects by working hands-on.

“At home, I felt like I had wings, but they had been clipped. Suddenly, when I came to Germany, I had so many options and I was able to learn. I learn something new every day that I, now, feel like I have learnt how to fly!”

The post My Experience Doing a Master’s Degree in Germany appeared first on Study in Germany for Free.



from
http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/StudyingGermany/~3/qKeFkpPL3VM/

Statement by Foreign Minister Steinmeier on the awarding of the German Africa Award to Thulisile Madonsela

Statement by Foreign Minister Steinmeier on the awarding of the German Africa Award to Thulisile Madonsela

Foreign Minister Steinmeier issued the following statement today (23 November) on the awarding of the German Africa Award to Thulisile Madonsela:

Zusatzinformationen

Thulisile Madonsela is being honoured today with the German Africa Foundation’s 2016 German Africa Award. This is a good choice and sends an important message!

In her role as Public Protector, she rendered outstanding services to democracy and the rule of law in South Africa for many years. But not only did she bring renown and prestige to the position, she always listened to people’s concerns, including and indeed especially as someone in the political spotlight. Her elegant modesty and calmness created trust and encouraged people. And she is certainly courageous. As the first woman in this position, she revealed what many people had suspected, gave a voice to the individual and was an advocate for the poor. This was not without conflict, but even death threats could not stop Ms Madonsela from fighting for what she believes in. She stood up boldly for what civil societies around the world rightfully demand, namely functioning democracies, the separation of powers, and reliable and trustworthy statehood.

Ms Madonsela is also renowned and admired for her work far beyond her own country. Today’s prize pays tribute to a courageous woman and puts the spotlight on what counts. My warmest congratulations!

Background information:

Since 1993, the German Africa Foundation has awarded the German Africa Award to honour outstanding individuals for their long-standing endeavours to foster democracy, peace, human rights, art, culture, the social market economy and social concerns. Chosen by an independent jury, the award winners reflect a nuanced view of Africa and encourage people to get more involved with the continent and its people.

Since being awarded for the first time by former German Federal President Richard von Weizsäcker over 20 years ago, the prize has always been awarded by leading German politicians, including Federal Chancellor Angela Merkel and former Federal President Horst Köhler. From the beginning, it has been very highly regarded in both Germany and Africa, receiving wide coverage in the media. In 2015, Federal President Joachim Gauck awarded the German Africa Award to Nobel Peace Prize laureate Houcine Abassi of Tunisia.

This year’s prize has been awarded to lawyer Thulisile Madonsela for her role as Public Protector in South Africa. The award ceremony will take place today at the Allianz office at the Brandenburg Gate. The prize will be awarded by Norbert Lammert, President of the German Bundestag.

Thulisile Madonsela is being honoured for her exceptional endeavours to defend the constitution and for her work in fighting corruption in South Africa. She served as Public Protector until October 2016, working tirelessly to uphold the principles of the rule of law in South Africa. Thulisile Madonsela was the first woman in this position, which was established to investigate corruption and abuse of power in the administration and government. As Public Protector, she took on many difficult cases, for which she also achieved international renown.



from
http://www.auswaertiges-amt.de/EN/Infoservice/Presse/Meldungen/2016/161123_Afrika-Preis.html?nn=479796

Speech by Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier on “Crisis diplomacy in full swing ‑ prospects for the future of Syria and the Middle East”

Speech by Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier on “Crisis diplomacy in full swing ‑ prospects for the future of Syria and the Middle East”

Staffan de Mistura,
Thomas,
Colleagues,
Fellow debaters,
Distinguished guests,

I’d like to thank the SPD parliamentary group for inviting me to this event and for granting me this opportunity to give a short introduction to this afternoon’s discussions.

Ladies and gentlemen,

I’ve come to you today with mixed feelings – or, to be more precise: I’m addressing an issue which has driven us to despair but with a guest who gives us cause to hope. Staffan de Mistura, you’re not just a trusted colleague and friend. 

Moreover, you’re not just a highly experienced diplomat with a global network. For, first and foremost, you’re a tireless worker for peace.  Ethiopia, Yugoslavia, Cyprus, Sudan, Afghanistan, Albania, Iraq, Somalia, Rwanda, Lebanon – during 45 years of working for peace there’s practically no dangerous or initially futile-seeming crisis or conflict in which you haven’t got involved. Not only I but countless others here in Europe and the region itself are glad that you’ve been working tirelessly for the last few years to bring about progress in the most cruel and complicated conflict of our time, namely the war in Syria. Thank you, Staffan de Mistura, for taking the time to be with us today and welcome to the SPD parliamentary group.

***

The sheer scale of the conflict you’re dealing with is unbearable; and yet, the cruel toll – in terms of stark, brutal numbers alone – continues to rise every day: more than five years of civil war; more than 400,000 dead; more than 11 million people who have lost their homes. The latest images from Aleppo plumb the depths of cruelty: a pile of rubble where a city teeming with life used to stand. This pitiless violence spirals even more with every school that is hit and every hospital that is destroyed. Here today, we again call on those responsible to end the attacks on civilian targets. They must cease! This appeal is directed at both the Syrian leadership and at those who support it.

***

Time and again I hear the question: how could such a disastrous conflict develop in Syria? I fear the paths to this inferno are so convoluted and complex that I can only touch on them here. We’ll discuss many aspects more fully in the course of this meeting.

First of all, we have the Syrian opposition to an oppressive regime, which now consists of hundreds of very different political, ethnic and religious groups; then there’s Iran and Saudi Arabia, the proxy powers of the Shiites and Sunnis, which have made the conflict in Syria part of their hegemonic struggle; in addition, the complex, sometimes contradictory and changing interests and alliances of the other regional players, namely the Gulf states or Turkey; the growing threat of Islamist terrorism; the barbaric crimes of the so-called Islamic State; and, of course, the regional influence of the major international powers, in particular the US and Russia.

Ladies and gentlemen, none of these explains the conflict fully; each of them is only one element of the overall problem. Just as there is no simple analysis of the causes of this conflict, there cannot be any simple solutions. We cannot simply cut the Gordian knot in Syria. For me, it’s clear that even though we have to take resolute action against the Islamic State, there cannot and will not be a military solution for the core conflict in Syria. Staffan, it’s crucial that we continue to back your work, namely your efforts to create the prerequisites for a political solution – even though the road to such a solution remains an arduous one. You can count on the support of this Government and of this parliamentary group.

***

Unfortunately, that brings another factor into play: in the early stages of the civil war, the international community failed to initiate realistic first steps towards possible solutions, even before the military escalation began. I remember only too well that when I travelled to Syria several times in 2006/2007 I was much criticised by the international community for doubting that simply classifying Syria as part of the “axis of evil” would make it easier to find solutions in the region. I also remember the painstaking efforts of your predecessor, Kofi Annan: after the Security Council withdrew its support for his proposals and the permanent members accused each other of torpedoing the process, Kofi Annan resigned in frustration as Joint Special Envoy on the Syrian Crisis in the summer of 2012. What’s more, I remember later major conferences on Syria at which the international community seemed to be discussing the situation as if Assad was no longer on the scene. But he was – indeed, he still is today. We in the West have to look at our own stance critically and recognise that in many ways this conflict is a story of missed opportunities, and that we have a shared responsibility to change this.

***

We meet today at a time when there’s a lot going on in the region. In saying that, I’m not expressing any kind of judgement: we don’t know yet in which direction events will take us; and there are certainly many causes for concern. However, if we want to see improvements then we have to analyse what’s happening, we have to look for new approaches, especially now that all efforts hitherto have failed. For that reason, too, Thomas and Niels, your event today comes at the right time.

The election of Donald Trump will, for sure, change US foreign policy in the Middle East. But we don’t yet know how.

There could also be movement in relations between the US and Russia. The question is whether that’ll have a constructive impact on the region. 

At the same time, the regional power structures are changing. The conflict in Yemen is placing a strain on Saudi Arabia’s military and political capabilities. A mere glance at the map reveals how closely the conflicts in Yemen and Syria are connected. John Kerry and others have been working to bring about a ceasefire in Yemen. Now that these efforts have proved unsuccessful, we have to hope that they’ll be renewed.

There are also other developments in the region: the resolution of the presidential crisis in Lebanon, for example, which surprised many, but of course also the problematic developments in Turkey – I, for one, returned from my trip there with more wrinkles than when I set off.

In the face of this instability in the region, it’s all the more important to maintain any progress made – especially – and I want to make this quite clear – the nuclear deal with Iran.

***

Friends,

None of us can say where all of this will lead. It’s therefore important at a time like this to be aware of our own position and responsibility. Firstly, of course, there’s the humanitarian situation. For as long as an overall political solution seems unachievable, small steps matter: any measures which alleviate the daily suffering of people, especially in Aleppo, are crucial. We’re therefore constantly engaged in talks with the UN and regional partners to lay the groundwork for humanitarian access.

However, taking responsibility also means working tirelessly on the political process. For despite all the current developments, the parameters remain the same as those set forth in the joint declaration of the International Syria Support Group in Vienna. We need cooperation between the major powers, the US and Russia, and we need a mechanism which forces the regional rivals to sit round the negotiating table and find a way to reconcile their interests as much as possible. While in the region over a year ago, I spoke to Arab intellectuals in the Saudi Arabian city of Jeddah. A young man at the back of the room said: “What we need is your 1648. We need a Peace of Westphalia for our region”. I was impressed by his remarks – not because I come from Westphalia but because this young man, unlike all the others, wasn’t talking about how to win the war but how to bring about peace. I think that should be our European approach at least and we want to work towards that, together with you and the United Nations. Staffan, I’d now like to hand over to you.



from
http://www.auswaertiges-amt.de/EN/Infoservice/Presse/Reden/2016/161122_BM_Krisendiplomatie.html?nn=479796

Speech by Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier at the ceremony to award the United Nations Association of Germany’s 2016 Dag Hammarskjöld Honorary Medal to Angela Kane and Staffan de Mistura

Speech by Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier at the ceremony to award the United Nations Association of Germany’s 2016 Dag Hammarskjöld Honorary Medal to Angela Kane and Staffan de Mistura

-- Translation of advance text --

Detlef Dzembritzki,
Angela Kane,
Staffan de Mistura,
Esteemed members of the United Nations Association of Germany,
Ladies and gentlemen,

“It is when we all play safe that we create a world of utmost insecurity.” Those are the words of Dag Hammarskjöld, the great UN Secretary-General and namesake of the medal we are awarding tonight.

To turn that around the other way, what he was saying was that, if we want to create peace, we must never simply take the path of least resistance. We must show courage. We cannot stick to the well-worn paths but must forge new roads. We must always be prepared to go the extra mile.

Angela Kane, Staffan de Mistura,

You have demonstrated time and again that you are not ones to simply follow signposted roads. You have proven your willingness to stick your necks out in pursuit of peace and security.

***

Angela Kane,

You needed and you demonstrated courage and leadership in Damascus in August 2013, when you negotiated the Syrian regime’s hand-over of its chemical weapons. While you were in Damascus, chemical weapons were deployed again. You sent your teams to investigate, to establish what had happened and bring transparency to those crimes. Your work on the ground played a major role in bringing about Syria’s accession to the Chemical Weapons Convention. Even more importantly, particularly dangerous chemical weapons were removed from the hands of a regime that not only possessed them but was known to be willing to use them against its own population. Let me thank you for that most especially!

***

Ms Kane, on your way to the top echelons of the UN – on your way to becoming the most high-ranking German woman on the UN staff – you repeatedly and successfully demonstrated your abilities as a tough negotiator, and not only in dealings with member states. Some would say, with a mixture of affection and cynicism, that you have managed to cope with an even tougher negotiating partner, namely the bureaucracy of the United Nations! As head of the UN Department of Management, you were responsible for the renovation of UN headquarters on New York’s East River. Not only did you implement that mammoth project, you also, even more impressively, got it done on time and on budget. Airports and concert halls in Germany have shown us just how hard that can be – even when you’re only building for one client. And you had 193 clients to please!

***

You not only managed to forge new paths within the United Nations. You also always had an eye for the political significance of your duties. As UN High Representative for Disarmament Affairs, you intervened in the gun-ownership debate in the United States. You took to the American press to publicly dispel deliberate misinformation being spread about the United Nations and its campaign against small arms. That’s very unusual for a high-ranking UN official. And it is brave to hold up a mirror to the gun lobby in the US.

***

Ladies and gentlemen,

The discussions surrounding the selection of the new UN Secretary-General this year made it clear once again that issues of gender equality are on the agenda in the UN as they are elsewhere, especially when it comes to filling important posts. While much remains to be done, there has been a significance cultural shift since you started work at the UN in 1977, without a supportive network and, some claim, without a valid work visa... There were no female role models back then, no women who had made it right to the very top levels of the UN. You made it there, and you also made it into a number of previously male-only domains – as deputy head of a peace mission and later as head of the UN Office for Disarmament Affairs. To go back to our metaphor, you have at the very least cleared a good deal of the undergrowth from the path for the women who will follow you and have you as a potential role model.

Ms Kane, please accept my sincere congratulations on receiving the Dag Hammarskjöld Honorary Medal tonight!

***

Staffan de Mistura,

I was talking with my fellow Bundestag members from the Social Democratic Party this afternoon about the intricate complexities of the Syria conflict. We know how hard it is at the moment to achieve even the smallest amount of humanitarian progress. And we are seeing recurrent setbacks at the political level, like when the Syrian regime rejected your proposals for an autonomous zone in Aleppo at the beginning of this week. Even under these difficult conditions, you are resolutely plodding on. I find myself wondering what drives you, Staffan – what gives you the strength.

Perhaps it is the difficult moments, the moments of human suffering, that drive you to fight for peace. You have been deployed in more than than 20 different crises and conflicts. You were in Iraq and Afghanistan most recently, served as a humanitarian aid worker in the civil wars in the former Yugoslavia before that and have also worked in Rwanda and Somalia. In the 1970s, when you were stationed in Cyprus for the UN, you saw with your own eyes how a child was killed at the divided island’s demarcation line. You responded with what you called constructive outrage – not stagnating in shock and dismay but engaging your will to change things, to combat the horror.

***

Watching you work these days, Staffan, as you tirelessly nurture ties between the conflict parties in the Syria talks and keep channels of communication open with all involved, one sees precisely that constructive outrage in action.

I can well remember one of those complicated meetings of the International Syria Support Group. Since we’re among UN experts today, and the UN is notoriously fond of its abbreviations, I have no qualms about using the English acronym: ISSG. We were standing together after an ISSG meeting – I exhausted, you still full of energy. When I hesitantly asked you what drove you to keep going even after such a difficult marathon of a meeting, you told me about the thick black book with gold trim which you kept on your desk. No, not the Bible or the Koran. It is a book containing the names of the people who have lost their lives to the civil war in Syria. Your answer to my question was, “Frank, this is what spurs me on.”

Staffan, you convert your outrage at the violence in Syria into positive energy which you bring to bear on the conflict parties.

Whenever things start to get particularly tight, whenever the atmosphere in the negotiating room seems to be getting too pressurised and opposing views become increasingly irreconcilable, people’s eyes turn to you. How often you have deployed that Italian elegance which I have always admired in you, and that knack of finding exactly the right words, to bring negotiating partners back to the table – even those who had already booked their tickets home to leave the Syria talks for good!

You kept working on that delegation until you finally persuaded them; instead of the talks collapsing completely with a unilateral walk-out, you were able to establish a temporary break. That may look like a small, maybe just semantic victory from the outside, but the reality is that you demonstrated that individual players cannot unilaterally end this crucial process. You clipped the wings of the “spoilers”, the veto players. Without you, we would not even have a political process any more. It is you who guarantees the possibility that there may still be a political settlement to this horrific war. You know you have my, and our, full support!

***

Ladies and gentlemen,

In case I’ve now made you think that Staffan de Mistura’s work for peace in Syria takes up all his time, let me disabuse you. Staffan, you hold another important office. For a change, it’s not a diplomatic job for the UN in your capacity as a citizen of the world. You are an honorary consul for your native country, Sweden, on the beautiful Mediterranean island of Capri. And you even live there. It’s probably a good thing this kind of job isn’t advertised, as the number of applicants would be through the roof!

***

Ladies and gentlemen,

In these turbulent times, we are putting our faith in the power of multilateral diplomacy. The United Nations is the cornerstone of a rules-based international order. There are many things the UN needs to truly fulfil that function, but nothing is more essential than excellent staff – staff for whom working for the United Nations is more than just a job; leaders who don’t make things easy for themselves but are persistent in their search for solutions, creative and courageous. In short, Angela Kane, Staffan de Mistura, it needs people like you. We need people like you in the United Nations, and the United Nations needs you! I am therefore delighted that you are receiving the Honorary Medal of the United Nations Association of Germany, which is named after another great UN figure: Dag Hammarskjöld. My most heartfelt congratulations to you both!

Thank you very much.



from
http://www.auswaertiges-amt.de/EN/Infoservice/Presse/Reden/2016/161122-BM_Dag_Hammarskj%C3%B6ld_Ehrenmedaille.html?nn=479796

Wednesday, November 23, 2016

The universe of immigrant crafts in Italy

The number of immigrant artisans in Italy is increasing. In the last five years, in fact, it grew by 8.3%. Especially regarding tailors (+129.7%), where ...

from
http://www.west-info.eu/the-universe-of-immigrant-crafts-in-italy/

Statement by Dr Bärbel Kofler, Federal Government Commissioner for Human Rights, on the right to privacy

Statement by Dr Bärbel Kofler, Federal Government Commissioner for Human Rights, on the right to privacy

Dr Bärbel Kofler, Federal Government Commissioner for Human Rights Policy and Humanitarian Aid at the Federal Foreign Office, issued the following statement today (23 November):

Zusatzinformationen

I am pleased that the Third Committee of the United Nations General Assembly once again approved by consensus a German-Brazilian resolution on the human right to privacy on Monday. In total, 70 countries supported the text as co-sponsors.

The protection of privacy is facing new challenges in the digital age. Effective protection of privacy can only be achieved by working together and on a global scale. By submitting the resolution, we are drawing attention to an important topic in the international debate and underlining that the rights people have outside the internet must also apply when they use the internet and express their views in it. This year, our resolution has highlighted companies’ responsibility for protecting private data.

In view of the importance of the right to privacy, the approval of the resolution by consensus is of particular significance. We primarily owe this success to our long-standing good work with Brazil and other partners.

Background information:

At the initiative of Brazil and Germany, with support from Mexico, Liechtenstein, Norway, Austria and Switzerland, the Third Committee of the United Nations General Assembly (Human Rights Committee) approved a resolution on the right to privacy in New York on Monday for the third time by consensus.  Formal adoption of the resolution by the plenary session of the General Assembly is scheduled for December.

In 2013 and 2014, decisions were made by consensus on the right to privacy in the digital age, also following a joint German-Brazilian initiative. In 2015, the Human Rights Council in Geneva appointed a Special Rapporteur on the topic at the initiative of Germany and Brazil. Traditionally, Germany has submitted resolutions in Geneva and New York on the right to privacy, the right to water and sanitation, and the right to adequate housing. Germany is also particularly active in New York as regards national human rights institutions and in Geneva as regards combating human trafficking.



from
http://www.auswaertiges-amt.de/EN/Infoservice/Presse/Meldungen/2016/161123_MRHH_Recht_auf_Privatheit.html?nn=479796

Speech by Minister of State for Europe Michael Roth at the “Quo vadis Europa?” conference at the University of Göttingen on 18 November 2016

Speech by Minister of State for Europe Michael Roth at the “Quo vadis Europa?” conference at the University of Göttingen on 18 November 2016

Ladies and gentlemen,

“I have the feeling that you at home are all absorbed by the situation in Europe and have forgotten that any shift, no matter how small, has an impact on the vast system of coordinates of global politics and that one day the reverberations could have fatal consequences for Europe.”

That sounds very topical. However, Adam von Trott wrote this in a letter home from Beijing on 18 June 1938. Even back then he recognised that Europe is a global player. What happens in Europe has an impact on our neighbourhood, indeed on the entire world.

But von Trott also wanted to say that we shouldn’t get lost in the minutiae of Europe’s situation but, rather, we must never lose sight of the big picture.

Especially in these times of crisis, we should remember over and again that whether it be Brexit, the economic and financial crisis in the eurozone, the refugee movements along the Balkan route or in the Mediterranean or the Islamist terrorism in the heart of Europe – we can’t simply barricade ourselves off from developments in our neighbourhood and that our “European” crises have consequences for the rest of the world. We live in a globalised world which is ever more interconnected. Everything is interlinked in some way or other.

The fact is that the European Union has brought us peace, freedom and prosperity during the last few decades. And Europe undoubtedly has what it takes to remain our best life insurance.

Nevertheless, many citizens – indeed many politicians – increasingly call into question Europe and the European Union. They have doubts about the meaning and value of Europe.

Here at this conference, you too are examining the question as to where Europe should head. “Quo vadis Europa?” – that’s the question to which you expect an answer from me today. I openly admit that this is a real million euro question.

But let me try all the same. For Europe is currently at a crossroads between being a continent where barriers and fences are being re-erected and national egoism is rearing its head once again, and a continent that stands together and acts in concert politically. Unfortunately, I have to tell you that when it comes to the road Europe will head along in the coming years – nothing is automatic in either direction.

It is now up to all of us, especially you, to get Europe back on the right track.

It’ll be interesting to see whether on Sunday, when this conference ends, you at least have an interim answer regarding Europe’s future. I certainly want to play my part. I’m happy to do so because this conference is the result of a new working partnership between the University of Göttingen and the Adam von Trott Foundation.

I’ve had ties with the Adam von Trott Foundation for many years. The von Trott family has been living for centuries in Imshausen, a small village in my constituency in northern Hesse.

Adam von Trott had links with Göttingen: he studied law here. However, Göttingen was just one part of his education.

During a stay in Geneva in 1928, the 19-year-old Adam von Trott saw international cooperation being put into practice. His commitment to peace and reconciliation was shaped there.

Von Trott was, as it were, an early prototype of today’s Erasmus students: during his studies abroad, among other places in Oxford, he changed his perspective time and again. He looked at Germany and its role in Europe while in China and the United States. Initially looking from the outside and later from inside Germany itself, he watched National Socialism grow stronger. He spoke of a “terrible disaster”.

While working at the Federal Foreign Office from 1940 to 1944, he rejected the Nazi regime and acted as a clandestine resistance fighter. For Adam von Trott wasn’t one to stand by and watch in silence.

He resisted, he spoke out. He didn’t silently toe the line.

As a supporter and member of the group around Claus Graf Schenk von Stauffenberg, he was arrested and, just a few weeks later, executed following the failed attempt to assassinate Adolf Hitler on 25 July 1944. Adam von Trott lost his life for taking a stand and refusing to go along with the mainstream in that era.

Adam von Trott can thus show us the way forward in our current situation. Fortunately, today we live in a very different world. In 2016, no-one has to pay for their political beliefs with their life, at least not in the EU. Even today, however, it requires considerable courage and steadfastness to stand against the tide of Europe-bashing, a widespread phenomenon.

It’s much easier to join those complaining about the Brussels bureaucratic monster and to make the EU the scapegoat for every possible failing.

Especially now, we need committed Europeans to defend the EU against criticism and the trend towards erosion. We have to admit that no-one is born a committed European in Europe’s democracies. The reasons in favour of a united Europe are no longer automatically clear to anyone nowadays. So what Europe needs now are people who are prepared to roll up their sleeves rather than those who simply go with the flow, people who inspire others rather than those who run everything down. Someone like Adam von Trott would be good for Europe right now.

I don’t want to sugar-coat anything here. The migration crisis, the CETA free trade agreement and the discussions about Brexit have left us facing enormous challenges.

All of these issues have resulted in more and more people losing confidence in the EU and longing to withdraw into their national shells. Unfortunately, the EU is no longer seen by many as an engine for freedom and prosperity but, rather, as a mighty and non-transparent structure which only produces crises and no longer results or solutions.

The EU is thus experiencing to an especially high degree something which national politics in many respects has also attracted: contempt. Politics in general, our democracy and particularly the EU aren’t considered capable of finding solutions which serve the common good. The distance between voters and those they elect is increasing despite the rise in direct modes of communication.

Quo vadis Europa? Let me use four current challenges to outline where we currently stand in Europe and what Europe’s future path could look like.

First of all, Europe has always seen itself as a unique peace project: peace, freedom, security and democracy – through a united Europe. But is that really true? Only the EU and its predecessor organisations have succeeded in bringing about peace following two world wars, fascism and the Holocaust. And have been doing so for seven decades.

The reality outside the EU looked, and indeed remains, very different: in South-Eastern Europe there was a terrible civil war in the 1990s which resulted in the deaths of hundreds of thousands of people as well as millions of displaced persons and refugees. At present, Eastern Europe, especially Ukraine, is being rocked by military conflict. No, the guns haven’t been silenced in Europe. Only the EU can guarantee what people long for all over the world. Europe is thus only a peace project when it dares to embrace close cooperation, growing communitarisation and coordination of competences.

This European Union continues to have a special obligation to ensure that peace, stability, freedom and democracy prevail throughout Europe. For that very reason, it’s so important to continue to give the countries of the Western Balkans an EU perspective and not to leave Eastern Europe to its own fate. How can we seriously shoulder more responsibility for the Middle East and Africa if we’re at risk of failing on our own continent?

The EU peace project must be transformed into a European peace project. This must be our shared aspiration.

With this pan-European pledge we pay tribute to Adam von Trott’s legacy. However, it remains so difficult especially because a short-term enlargement of the EU to include a number of new states would most likely lead to overextension and disintegration. Rapid accessions certainly won’t solve our problems. However, the EU has to do a lot more – whether in Serbia or the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Ukraine or Moldova.

Second, the influx of hundreds of thousands of refugees has generated fears in Europe about being overrun by people from other cultures or a deterioration in the social and economic situation. Many people feel that the EU has failed in this crisis. I don’t believe that’s true. But one thing certainly is true: we still have a lot of work to do among the EU member states to convince them that we need a European migration policy which truly deserves that name.

Initial key steps to enhance solidarity within the EU have already been taken: the member states intend to do more to help each other through Frontex in order to regain control over access at our external borders. One major milestone in this respect is the agreement on the establishment of a European border and coast guard agency. By better protecting our external borders, we’ll create more security for individuals. Open internal borders in Europe can only work on a long-term basis if the EU states effectively safeguard the Schengen area’s external borders. We have to know who’s coming to us: where, when and how.

Cooperation on migration policy with countries of origin and transit has now become an integral part of European foreign and development policy.

Together with France, we’re supporting the EU Commission’s proposal to conclude migration partnerships with third countries outside the EU. For we want to combat the causes of refugee movements, not the refugees. First and foremost, this is about investing in supply flows and security, education and training. This will benefit both refugees and the native populations.

Third, in the last few weeks the EU free trade agreement CETA with Canada has provoked heated debate. The discussions have shown that many people fear change in an ever more globalised world. For many people, TTIP and CETA have degenerated into a symbol of unfettered market radicalism. They fear that the social welfare state will be dismantled, high European standards watered down and that jobs are under threat.

Despite all the – in some cases justified – criticism, we shouldn’t forget that the EU’s common external trade policy is an engine for the European economy which is contributing to growth and employment in Europe. The fact that our global economy is ever more interconnected brings not only risks but, above all, huge opportunities. We owe our economic prosperity and many of our jobs to free trade. In Europe, we’ve thus achieved something without equal in the world: the coupling of economic-ecological progress to a social security system for citizens. Economic progress is most definitely not an end in itself.

In addition to the purely economic advantages, it’s at least equally important that the EU as a whole has the opportunity through agreements like CETA to help shape the rules for tomorrow’s world.

Globalisation is not a destiny to which we must yield without question. No, globalisation can be shaped – in a social, democratic and sustainable way. A forward-looking EU trade policy can help to ensure on a durable basis that standards are improved for everyone – for people both inside and outside the EU. Regrettably, I’ve noticed that this argument is too often missing in the heated debate about free trade agreements, which is often marked by half-truths. However, I expressly recognise that public pressure and criticism have helped improve quite a few aspects. As long as we’re unable to set ambitious internationally binding standards via the WTO, agreements such as CETA are key steps in the right direction.

Fourth, the internal cohesion of the EU has been badly shaken by the vote by the UK electorate to leave the EU. I regret this decision, but I have to accept it: in future, the United Kingdom will go its own way.

Brexit is an important juncture and a wake-up call. But there’s one thing I can guarantee: Brexit certainly doesn’t mean the end of the EU. The remaining 27 member states have made it clear that we stand united: for us the EU continues to provide an essential framework for our actions. With the Bratislava process, the 27 states have shown that they’re looking ahead after the Brexit vote. By the 60th anniversary of the Rome Treaties in March 2017, a series of concrete steps are to be drawn up. Admittedly, that doesn’t sound especially bold. However, the EU treaties already give member states the opportunity to move forward with greater determination. This means that greater differentiation is possible. Although I reject the idea of a two-speed Europe, I support an avant-garde, a Europe of countries which can inspire bold action.

What we desperately need now, however, are concrete results which prove the EU’s capability to act.

Neither the calls for a grand venture, that’s to say a major step towards greater integration, nor calls for powers to be repatriated to nation-states, are appropriate at present. What we have to do now is find our feet again. We have to show people, especially in the areas of policy in which they rightly expect more from the EU, that the EU can deliver convincing solutions and results which an individual member state couldn’t achieve on its own.

It goes without saying that the EU shouldn’t control everything down to the smallest detail. However, when it comes to protecting the climate, regulating the financial markets, combating international terrorism or dealing effectively, but most especially humanely and in a spirit of solidarity, with international flows of refugees – the only way to achieve all of this is through joint European action. These are the global issues where old-fashioned nation-states really show their limitations.

In the globalised world of the 21st century, even Germany, though apparently so big, can only realise and defend its interests within and by means of Europe. For in the global pond, we’re a pretty small fish on our own. Only a united Europe offers us a chance to regain some of our lost capacity to act and exert an influence on the world stage. It’ll be interesting to see how people in the UK think about this in a few years’ time.

What Europe’s future will look like isn’t a question only for politicians. We have to conduct the dialogue about Europe’s prospects to a greater extent outside EU headquarters and cordoned-off conference centres in Brussels, Strasbourg or Luxembourg. We have to involve all players and, in this way, renew the basic consensus on European integration.

This conference here in Göttingen, which is spending an entire weekend examining the major challenges facing Europe within and in an international context, is a good example of this.

One thing is especially important to me: we mustn’t allow populists and nationalists to determine our actions. We mustn’t simply react but, rather, we have to try and steer the public discourse ourselves.

In order to do so, we must of course look at the legitimate concerns and fears among the general population. However, we mustn’t give in to the temptation to simply run after the populists and to copy their cheap slogans in a watered down version. That won’t work for, in the end, the original and not the copy always gets elected. Instead, we have to embark on the much more difficult path:

We have to counter the sceptics, critics and oversimplifiers with facts, arguments and by putting our commitment to Europe into practice. We have to explain in a transparent fashion what we’re doing and why we’re not doing something else.

What needs to be done? Let me set out two proposals:

First, the controversy about refugee policy revealed that there is no longer a consensus on our European social model. Nationalists advocate homogeneous societies and fuel fears of being overrun by people from different cultures and of loss of identity. That’s not just a violation of the EU treaties. For anyone who has looked at Europe’s history knows that we’ve always been a continent of migration and immigration. Europe’s societies are values-based. And each and every individual is bound by these values. The EU is far from being an economic construct free of any obligations. We are a community founded on shared values.

And we are open to different cultures, ethnicities and religions. Admittedly, that’s demanding, but it’s also enormously enriching. Anyone who wants a diverse and colourful Europe must highlight these values time and again and seek consensus on them.

Second, the growing nationalism also feeds on the resentment of those opposed to modernisation – all over Europe. For them, for instance, equal rights for women or the recognition of sexual minorities and their equality go far too far. They feel increasingly alien in their own countries. I’ve never read so much nonsense and crazy rubbish as I have recently. No matter how absurd a conspiracy theory is, it attracts attention in the social networks. At the same time, people claim that their freedom of opinion is being excessively restricted by supposed political correctness.

Let me make it clear: I’m proud of the social progress in Europe. There’s nothing to relativise here or even turn back.

However, arrogance and disdain won’t get us anywhere. It’s easy to become indignant about angry white men. It’s more difficult to talk to them. That’s the background I come from. People who increasingly feel that their own culture is disappearing, who fear they’re in danger of losing their place in society and their jobs due to globalisation, need someone to listen to them not only in the AfD or the Front Nationale but also, indeed foremost, in social democratic and progressive parties. Let me state categorically that racism, anti-Semitism and homophobia were and always will be completely unacceptable. Spelling this out is part of my understanding of a culture of dialogue in which clear opinions are expressed but without arrogance.

At political level, of course, a clear commitment also means honestly naming the failures – but also the successes – of the EU. Politicians in particular should take this to heart. Unfortunately, it’s still often the case that successes are celebrated as national successes while failures and problems are blamed on Brussels. That has to stop.

Even if it sounds trivial, the best way to counter Europe fatigue is still to experience Europe. That’s why we have to enable the greatest possible number of young people to see Europe first-hand, regardless of their parents’ financial means. This is exactly what the life of Adam von Trott shows us: how important it is to gather one’s own experiences and to see things from a different perspective now and again.

In Geneva, he saw how a multilateral framework for international relations can foster peace.

During his periods of study in Britain, he wasn’t only able to look at Germany from the outside but also to get to know committed young Britons. The political pragmatism of the British and the goals of the labour movement had a lasting impact on his views.

Adam von Trott showed us the way. He became a committed European as a young man. Europe’s future lies in the hands and minds of its young people. They, too, have to experience Europe first-hand. It will be very difficult to convince young people of Europe’s value merely by pointing out the horrors of its past.

What Europe has been lacking time and again is empathy and passion. We need a lot more of both. Yes, it’s true that in the EU today, we are living our dream of peace, freedom, democracy and prosperity on a daily basis. Yet it’s also true that dreams, once realised, tend to quickly become banal and taken for granted in everyday life.

Nearly all of us have seen that happen first-hand. Europe: for many people nowadays, it seems like a couple who have been together for a long time. The high of young love has passed, and the nitty-gritty of everyday life is taking centre-stage. The relationship is starting to show the strain; doubts are growing.

But Europe isn’t just a playpen for detail-worshipping technocrats. Europe isn’t a craze to make everything the same, to spread uniformity and amalgamate differences. On the contrary, Europe is the dream of diversity, the guarantor of our individual ways of life, our life insurance in this turbulent age of globalisation. We ought to remind ourselves of that when we’re next in doubt about the point and value of Europe.

I said at the start of my speech that what Europe needs now are people who are prepared to roll up their sleeves rather than those who simply go with the flow, people who inspire others rather than those who run everything down. Someone like Adam von Trott would be good for Europe right now. That’s why I think it’s great that the University of Göttingen and the Adam von Trott Foundation are working together so closely. For we all know that the future needs us to remember the past. And we can learn a lot by remembering Adam von Trott and, indeed, derive strength for future tasks.



from
http://www.auswaertiges-amt.de/EN/Infoservice/Presse/Reden/2016/161118_StM_Roth_Quo_Vadis_Europa.html?nn=479796